Designer’s Notebook: What Designers Need to Know About Manufacturing, Part 2
The Pulse: Drilling Down on Documentation
Connect the Dots: Designing for Reality: Prioritizing ManufacturabilityBOOK EXCERPT: 'The Printed Circuit Designer’s Guide to... Stackups—The Design within the Design', Chapter 5
January 30, 2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 1 minute
This excerpt is from The Printed Circuit Designer’s Guide to... Stackups—The Design within the Design, Chapter 5 by Bill Hargin, Z-Zero
Chapter 5: Impedance Planning
In my work, I deal with impedance and the entire ecosystem surrounding it daily. Whenever I talk to hardware teams, they often ask “how can two fabricators come back with two totally different designs for the same target impedance?” An example can help answer this question.
A client provided a stackup design which I ran through Z-planner Enterprise software. I compared these results with results from the HyperLynx field solver and the values in the stackups, which are often from unknown tools or with a few details obscured. Figure 5.1 shows a few examples from the same design.
The two stackup environments—Z-planner Enterprise and HyperLynx—showed up to 6-ohm differences for single-ended signals and up to 13 ohms for differential signals, compared to fabricator values. All of the signal-integrity simulations in the world cannot help if we assume a target impedance but the actual fabricated design is off this much. Electronic design automation (EDA) tools such as these can be super useful if you know what they are really modeling. Even here, the results are only as good as the data put in.
Factors That Impact Impedance
The primary parameters that affect impedance are shown in Table 5.1, including their relative contributions.
If you work this list top to bottom, you will be better equipped to dial in your nominal parameters with enough margin. Yet, I regularly see engineering teams straining to perform complex analyses using datasets with questionable merit, and without fully grasping these parameters and priorities. For example, I have never seen detailed, per-layer, percent-copper values from actual PCB layouts being used by PCB fabricators to compute pressed prepreg thicknesses.
Number 4 in Table 5.1 can be particularly problematic. For increased accuracy, keep track of not only the material family, but also resin content (%), and frequency.
Number 5, trace width, is closely tied to fabricator etching processes.
Share on:
Suggested Items
Cadence Continues ‘Left Shift’ of SI Functions
02/29/2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamAt DesignCon, the I-Connect007 Editorial Team met with Brad Griffin, product marketing group director for the System Analysis Group at Cadence Design Systems. Brad explains how this analysis tool enables designers to address SI and PI issues early in the design process, before they become costly errors, and why he believes his late co-worker Dennis Nagel would be proud to see his efforts come to fruition.
Beyond Design: Embedded Capacitance Material
02/22/2024 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignEmbedding components into the multilayer PCB substrate can have many benefits, including reduced board size and improved signal integrity. However, embedded capacitance material (which is not really a component but rather part of the substrate) can improve power integrity dramatically by reducing AC impedance and generally enhancing the performance of the product. It takes up no additional space, is easy to implement (because it is compatible with standard FR-4 processes), and can be cost-effective.
Connect the Dots: Controlled Impedance and Calculations for Microstrip Structures
12/28/2023 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsModern high-speed and RF PCB design is an exciting field but comes with its own set of challenges. Signal integrity, performance, and crosstalk become major concerns. Designers for these types of projects need to learn how to control electromagnetic interference (EMI) and compatibility (EMC), which means utilizing some interesting math and calculations.
Elementary, Mr. Watson: Consider Physics When Designing Non-traditional Geometries
12/28/2023 | John Watson -- Column: Elementary, Mr. WatsonElectronics have profoundly impacted society, shaping how we live, communicate, work, and entertain ourselves. Nearly every aspect of our lives is affected by electronics in some way. If you want proof, sit and watch people in public; everyone is on a screen. The communication revolution alone has transformed our lives, enabling instant global connectivity. Some would argue these advances come with their distinct disadvantages.
Reduce Board Skyline With Solid Cavity Design
07/20/2023 | Kris Moyer, IPCWith the increasing shrinkage of modern electronics in both board size and product volume, it’s becoming more difficult to mount components to the PCB surface and still meet volumetric requirements. To avoid chip-on-board (COB) processing, board cavities can help mitigate the Z-axis skyline volumetric issues and allow for components that would otherwise not fit within the skyline to be used.