Material Witness: R.I.P. Speedboard C


Reading time ( words)

Material Witness by Chet Guiles

When W. L. Gore recently announced plans to discontinue their Speedboard® C product, it created a bit of a stir in the marketplace. Here was a product that was unique and versatile and that, for many of us in the laminates business, made possible the use of our materials in applications that otherwise could have been problematic. Those of us who have been in the industry for more than a couple of years know that products, even good ones, come and go for a variety of technical and business reasons. Just as materials need to meet applications with "fit, form and function," the same kinds of criteria determine the fit of a given product for a business segment. Another example of a very good product being discontinued is the demise of the DuPont Thermount® product a few years back. That, too, created a bit of furor in the industry, but in the end in that case as in the case of Speedboard C we have to bite the collective bullet and find a way to move on.

What is it that the industry found so useful about the Speedboard C product? Because it was made using W. L. Gore's unique expanded PTFE fibers in the base fabric, with a formulated low dielectric constant thermoset resin system, the product was very useful in bonding together a variety of microwave and RF products where dissimilar and hard to bond layers of materials (such as Teflon laminates) needed to be multi-layered into a complex design. The key properties in this writer's mind were the low dielectric constant and reasonable loss, combined with the fact that it was a high-Tg (220°C) thermoset system that stuck well to a variety of materials. This combination is not easy to achieve and without the boost from the proprietary low Dk expanded PTFE reinforcement, replacing it represents something of a conundrum for the industry.

What does a product need to be and do to be useful in the sorts of applications that used Speedboard® C? As a minimum:

  • Low dielectric constant for high signal speeds;
  • Dielectric constant stable over a range of frequencies;
  • Low loss for optimized signal integrity;
  • Excellent adhesion to PTFE and other microwave/RF cores;
  • Processable in standard Lamination cycles; and
  • Good peel strength to standard copper foils.

What are the limitations in achieving Speedboard C Properties?

Speedboard C was a unique product based on a formulated cyanate ester resin system coated on WL Gore's proprietary expanded PTFE reinforcement. This resulted in excellent dielectric constant (2.6), good loss (0.004) and a high Tg (220°C) resin system compatible with lead-free fabrication. Full Tg development was obtainable using a cure temperature over 200°C (typical for polyimide and cyanate ester resins), though the product could be cured at lower temperatures (high Tg epoxy cures typically at 380°C) albeit with a lower Tg development.

The higher water absorption typical of cyanate ester resin systems is an issue in microwave systems, since water has a high dielectric constant (about 70) and is highly polar, which means that both Dk and df can be significantly affected at higher frequencies.

No replacement material will be Speedboard C, but an alternative offering from Arlon approximates the important electrical properties with the advantage of a much lower loss (0.002 versus 0.004 for the Speedboard C resin system) and significantly reduced water absorption. A ceramic-filled two-part resin system, the GenCladTM 280 product has lower X-Y CTE for improved registration stability and a high decomposition temperature which makes it usable in PTFE fusion-bonding lamination cycles. The ceramic component helps stabilize the Dk over temperature and the low thermal coefficient of dielectric constant is comparable to many filled PTFE products A comparison of key values for GenClad 280 and Speedboard C are shown in the following table:


* Dk values are not reported on comparable test methods.

So what are the trade-offs? And how will they impact performance?

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Decreasing Bend Radius and Improving Reliability—Part I

10/11/2019 | Kelsey Smith, All Flex
Many of the issues that arise when using a flex circuit come from a lack of knowledge about how to properly design one, especially when the circuit is required to bend.

Communication, Part 2: Design Data Packages

10/11/2019 | Steve Williams, The Right Approach Consulting LLC
The first part of this six-part series highlighted ways that PCB fabricators and designers can better communicate, starting with how to qualify a board shop. In Part 2, Bob Chandler and Mark Thompson talk about the importance of preparing, sending, and receiving comprehensive (and ideally, perfectly complete) design data packages.

Standards: Why We Have Them and Live by Them

10/07/2019 | Alifiya Arastu, Jeff Beauchamp, Harry Kennedy, and Ruben Contreras, NCAB GROUP
Have you ever designed a board but received feedback that it couldn’t be manufactured unless changes were made? Or maybe you’ve designed a complex board and sent it to the factory only to find out that the manufacturer didn’t build the board to your expectations? PCBs are becoming more complex, factory options are growing, and expectations for product life cycles are becoming longer.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.